The War on Wisconsin

- Accuracy In Media - http://www.aim.org -

Posted By Michelle Malkin On March 28, 2012 @ 2:24 pm In Guest Columns | 2 Comments

Now is the time for all good tea partiers to come to the aid of Wisconsin. Fiscally conservative leaders in the Badger State are under coordinated siege from Big Labor, the White House, the liberal media and the judiciary. The yearlong campaign of union thuggery, family harassment and intimidation of Republican donors and businesses is about to escalate even further. This is the price the Right pays for doing the right thing.

The most visible target is Gov. Scott Walker, who faces recall on June 5 over his tough package of state budget and public employee union reforms. Three state GOP legislators — Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald, Sen. Van Wanggaard and Sen. Terry Moulton — also face recall. A fourth target, staunch union reformer and Second Amendment advocate Sen. Pam Galloway, announced she was stepping down last week — leaving the legislature deadlocked and Democratic strategists salivating.

Walker and the GOP majority ended the union compulsory dues racket, allowed workers to choose whether to join a union, curtailed costly bargaining rights and enacted pension and health contribution requirements to bring the government in line with private-sector practices. The Walker reform law helped prevent massive layoffs in public education by saving tens of millions of dollars in bloated benefits bills. Ending the state union monopoly on teachers’ health insurance plans allowed dozens of school districts to switch their coverage to more competitive bidders.

The free-market MacIver Institute reports that at least 25 school districts did so, saving the districts more than $200 per student. Hundreds of millions more in savings are in the works as school districts and local governments turn deficits to surpluses. And Walker’s actions have nearly wiped out the nearly $3.6 billion deficit he inherited from his free-spending predecessors.

New poll data released on Tuesday show two potential Democratic rivals neck and neck with Walker. Wisconsin politicos tell me his national name recognition has bolstered public awareness and fundraising efforts. He’s currently sitting on a $5 million war chest. Walker supporters believe the Big Labor-fueled fight will be dirty, but with vigilant backing, he’ll survive.

The outlook for the unhinged Left’s secondary targets, however, is not so bright. Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch ^[1], a tea party candidate who is not part of the GOP establishment, is being treated as collateral damage by the party. Outside of Wisconsin, most conservative activists are not even aware that she may be booted from office for simply doing her job. Kleefisch told me that on a recent fundraising swing in D.C., national GOP leaders were shocked to learn of her plight.

While Democratic femme-a-gogues continue their plaintive wailing about a “war on women,” Kleefisch has battled vile misogyny from liberal detractors. When lefty Wisconsin radio host John “Sly” Sylvester accused Kleefisch of performing “fellatio on all the talk-show hosts in Milwaukee ^[2]” and sneered that she had “pulled a train” (a crude phrase for gang sex), feminists remained silent. A former television anchor, small businesswoman and mother of two, Kleefisch’s quiet work on economic development has reaped untold dividends for the state. But if conservatives who preach the gospel of fiscal conservatism do not act, the profligate progressives’ vendetta against Wisconsin may result in the first-ever recall of a lieutenant governor in American history.

Kleefisch, a 36-year-old colon cancer survivor, is a fighter ^[3] who points to her two young daughters when I ask why she’s in the political arena. What message would it send to young tea party moms across the country if Walker survived but Kleefisch was hung out to dry? Will Beltway Republican strategists and donors who constantly harp about the need to diversify the party step up to the plate? [Donate to Kleefisch's defense here ^[4].]

President Obama, the AFL-CIO, SEIU, AFSCME and left-wing operatives know that Wisconsin is Ground Zero in their battle against limited-government activists. Their demagogic propaganda war against Wisconsin GOP Rep. Paul Ryan, who is leading entitlement reform and budget discipline efforts in Washington, is of a piece with the campaign to overturn the popular elections that put Walker, Kleefisch and the GOP majority in place. If they can chill fiscal responsibility and free market-based reforms in Wisconsin, they can chill it everywhere. Will movement conservatives let them?

---

Article printed from Accuracy In Media: http://www.aim.org

URL to article: http://www.aim.org/guest-column/the-war-on-wisconsin/

URLs in this post:

[1] Lt. Gov. Rebecca Kleefisch: http://www.rebeccaforreal.com/

[2] fellatio on all the talk-show hosts in Milwaukee: http://michellemalkin.com/2011/01/20/lib-radio-talker-attacks-gop-lt-gov-of-wi-she-performed-fellatio-on-all-the-talk-show-hosts-in-milwaukee-and-pulled-a-train/

[3] fighter: http://www.rebeccaforreal.com/bio/

[4] here: https://secure.piryx.com/donate/41x5rSs8/people-for-rebecca/forward

 

video on what extreme environmentalist does to a community.

The Obamacare Hydra

Posted By Michelle Malkin On March 26, 2012 @ 12:20 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | 16 Comments

 The Hydra was a mythical swamp beast whose multiple heads grew back after being severed. Obamacare is a real Washington monster whose countless hidden bureaucracies keep sprouting forth even after they’re rooted out. As soon as combatants lop off one of the law’s unconstitutional agencies, another takes its place.

On Thursday, as the behemoth federal health care law marked its second anniversary, House Republicans repealed the infamous Independent Payment Advisory Board. The mother of all death panels, IPAB would have unprecedented authority over health care spending through a rogue board of 15 Medicare spending czars. The House repeal has a snowball’s chance in hell of surviving the Senate. But IPAB’s legality is being challenged in federal court by the conservative Arizona-based Goldwater Institute. And the more the public knows about these freedom-usurping, taxpayer-soaking institutions buried in the health care law the less they like it.

Seven House Democrats crossed the aisle to vote for the GOP majority rollback. Analysts on both sides of the political aisle have decried IPAB’s complete lack of accountability and insulation from judicial review. Critical decisions about public and private health insurance payment rates would be freed from the normal administrative rules process – public notice, public comment, public review — that governs every other federal commission in existence. Rep. Todd Akin, R-Mo., summed up bipartisan opposition: “IPAB embodies the very thing Americans fear most about ObamaCare — unaccountable Washington bureaucrats meeting behind closed doors to make unilateral decisions that should be made by patients and their doctors.”

The problem with piecemeal repeal is that for every old IPAB, there’s a new, multibillion-dollar bureaucracy waiting in the Obamacare wings. Senate Republicans and fellow medical doctors Tom Coburn and John Barrasso point to a $10 billion entity called the “Innovation Center” that “would test innovative payment and service delivery models to reduce program expenditures under Medicare, Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).”

According to a new Congressional Research Service analysis of this little known office to be operated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, there would be “no administrative or judicial review” of the director’s payment experiments.

Coburn and Barrasso explain that “(t)his means that the administrator of CMS is the sole individual in the entire federal government with the power to decide whether or not models tested negatively impact seniors’ quality of care and meet the financial requirements spelled out in law.”

This “innovation” super-czar would be allowed to tinker behind closed doors — and then impose whatever experiments the “innovation center” chooses without any checks or balances on the methods or results. Moreover, at least two other sub-offices within CMS (subject to normal open meetings and open records rules) have already been tasked with researching payment and delivery models. Health care blogger Tevi Troy at NationalReview.com warns: “The ‘innovation’ center appears to be one more way in which the health-care law is going to interfere with the practice of medicine, and one that physicians should start paying more attention to.”

It’s not just physicians who need to pay attention. Every taxpayer has a stake. At the end of the month, this shadowy agency will start doling out $1 billion in grants to payment experiment groups and data-tracking system builders. Sounds like yet another pipeline for political payoffs and Chicago-style boodle that will result in less patient autonomy, fewer health care choices, more government intrusion and lower-quality care.

Final diagnosis: The Obamacare beast won’t die until it’s eradicated completely, root and branch.

African-American Lynch Mob

Posted by David Horowitz Bio ↓ on Mar 26th, 2012 Comments

Is anybody else out there as sick and tired as I am of lynch mob racists like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton (vide: Tawana Brawley, the Duke Lacrosse kids) who don the mantel of the “civil rights” movement to indict non-blacks in advance of the facts, and incite racial rage against them? Yet that is exactly what they – and scores of black leaders — are doing to an Hispanic individual named George Zimmerman. Along with a cast of thousands, they are holding him guilty of racism before the fact, justifying a hatred, as inflammatory as the hatred once spewed by southern crackers against blacks.

There is no evidence whatsoever that race was a defining factor in the tragic death of Trayvon Martin. Notwithstanding the absence of evidence, this unhappy incident is now the occasion for school shut-downs, mass marches and public death threats by enraged African Americans, displaying behaviors reminiscent of the lynch mobs that were once a scourge of their parents’ generation in a now rejected past.

The facts surrounding the death of Trayvon Martin have not been investigated and are still uncertain. But the lynch mob has delivered its verdict: George Zimmerman is guilty of a race crime; Trayvon Martin was killed because he was black. “Trayvon is the Emmett Till of our generation,” said one mob leader, referring to the 12-year-old who was murdered by white racists in 1955 for whistling at a white woman.

There is no verifiable evidence for this fact-challenged, inflammatory, claim. According to the lone eyewitness to come forward, it was Martin who attacked Zimmerman and was on top of him and beating him to a pulp when the fatal shot was fired. The fact that Zimmerman’s face was bloody when the police arrived, is an apparent corroboration of this version of the event. Is this what happened? We don’t know. But it is a claim that should get tested in a court of law. Unfortunately to a lynch mob the evidence is irrelevant, the conclusion foregone.

If the demonstrators were merely calling for an investigation that would be proper. But the cries for retribution, and the accusations of racism, which dominate the public demonstrations are not. And that goes for the statement of the President as well. Not willing to be separated from his racial constituency, even when they are behaving badly, Obama has lent his prestige to the insinuation that the crime was inspired by the victim’s race. Otherwise there would be no reason to mention the fact that “If I had a son, he would look like Trayvon.” Everyone who has a son should be concerned by the loss of this life. By making it racial, the president is establishing guilt without evidence, and indicting non-black America as well.

The display of racial outrage over this case is a national disgrace. It is a throwback to the past and a shameful repudiation of the values the civil rights movement once stood for but apparently does no longer.

Trayvon Martin and the Politics of Racial Guilt

- FrontPage Magazine - http://frontpagemag.com -

Posted By Daniel Greenfield On March 26, 2012 @ 12:55 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage | 130 Comments

When at the beginning of March, Allen Coon, a thirteen-year-old boy, was set on fire by two black teenagers who told him, “You get what you deserve, white boy,” this did not prove to be an occasion for national soul-searching. But the shooting death of Trayvon Martin by a Hispanic neighborhood watch captain after a scuffle between the two men has led to hysterical media coverage, state and federal investigations, civil rights marches, lynching threats from the Black Panthers and a statement from Obama urging Americans to search their souls for some unspecified reason.

The latter took time out from the trivial business of nominating a World Bank president to interfere in a local law enforcement matter and join his good friend Al Sharpton, who specializes in racist rhetoric, in throwing some racebaiting gasoline on the flames.

To Obama, the significance of the whole event was that Trayvon Martin looked like his hypothetical son, which presumably Allen Coon did not. The insufferable egotism of that statement suggests that shooting victims only matter if they look anything like the head cheese. It’s racial feudalism and personal politics at its ugliest even as it once again confronts us with Obama’s inability to talk about anything without shining it through the narcissistic lens of the self.

Even Trayvon Martin only matters because he is in some hypothetical sense linked to Obama, and every trending topic from Jeremy Lin to the million hoodie march must be commented on by him in some way to demonstrate his own relevance in the mobius strip of fame. There can be no 2012 election without the race card, and so Martin was posthumously drafted into the Obama family portrait that appears on campaign ads to remind the rest of the country that they still need to feel guilty and vote the left’s ticket.

“All of us have to do some soul searching,” Obama urged, as somehow a local shooting had become a national matter and then a burden of guilt staining the souls of an entire nation. With the dexterous agility of the practiced race huckster, a Hispanic man shooting a black man had become another reminder of our endless burden of racial guilt. A burden that only our pope of the race card could briefly lift from us in a climactic moment of electoral hope and change.

If Obama had enough time to spare in between playing golf, campaigning, wasting money and race-baiting, he might have taken a seat by the window, put his famous abbreviated chin on one skinny fist and searched his soul for all the people killed in Mexico by his own Attorney General’s plot to wreck the Second Amendment. But the soul-searching never seems to happen on the right side of the Oval Office window. It is a duty handed down to us from our betters, like schoolmarms urging us to “think about what you’ve done” until eventually you decide that you must have done something.

Obama said that it was “absolutely imperative”  that the shooting be investigated at “federal, state and local”  levels and praised the Florida governor for forming a task force to investigate the incident. From the overload of rhetoric, an outside observer might have been forgiving for assuming that this was the first time anyone had been shot in the country this year.

The Trayvon Martin case was far from the worst shooting death this year. Or even the worst shooting death involving an African-American victim. That honor might belong to Delric Waymon Miller IV, a nine-month-old boy killed in Detroit when his house was peppered with an AK-47 assault rifle just last month. The investigation on that one is still ongoing and could presumably benefit from federal assistance, which it won’t receive because there is no political payday from highlighting black on black violence. Or from helping to solve a crime instead of stirring up racial hate.

There is a major payday in playing up white on black violence, and though George Zimmerman proved to be Hispanic with African-American relatives, the media which clings to a racial narrative like a hungry bulldog to a dead rat, is still forging ahead hoping that no one will notice.

The same Justice Department which saw no basis for charging Black Panther thugs with voter intimidation at the polls despite a video showcasing their antics, is flirting with bringing hate crime charges against Zimmerman based on an indistinguishable muttered word on a recording. Even though there is eyewitness testimony that Trayvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman, that the latter was bleeding and on the ground, the grievance lynch mob has reached its conclusion. No more evidence needed, thank you very much.

Like the lynch mobs of old, the facts are already known. All that is needed is a fig leaf of judicial procedure to give them what they want. A lynching.

To read the media is to witness the inerrant and inescapable conviction of George Zimmerman in the press. Every article cries out that he is guilty and strongly suggests that racism is the only possible explanation why he isn’t on death row. From the White House on down, the baying hounds are determined to put him there, not based on the evidence, but on the narrative.

It’s not really about a Hispanic neighborhood watch captain, who may have been overzealous, but whose vigilance had likely saved lives and certainly prevented crimes in the past. It’s about the narrative in which we are all George Zimmerman. We are Zimmerman and he is us. We are all guilty of racism, and the only way to atone for it is with Two Minute Hates by morality mobs that find a deserving victim, drag him out and lynch him to exonerate ourselves of the charges.

The original sin of racism can never be shaken. We can only buy a temporary stay of execution by voting for Obama or indicting George Zimmerman. The consequences of the act don’t really matter, only the abnegation, the temporary easing of the burden of racial conscience with a moment of peace, a brief glow of Hope and Change that promises things will be different, only to point its finger at us again and demand that we search our souls and scourge ourselves to atone for the slave ships and plantations.

Obama knows better than most how the game is played. As a descendant of privileged Africans and American whites, he has no skin in the game; he is an outside observer of the dysfunction of Americans of both colors and an expert at manipulating their tensions for his own benefit. Having played out hope, he has fastened on guilt, a primal emotion that promises nothing, but takes everything. Much as he has done. To complete the great work, he will work the power of guilt and promise once again to lift the sin of racism from us, if we only shut down our minds, forget about our jobs and businesses, and blindly push the lever once more.

Freedom Center pamphlets now available on Kindle: Click here.

Germany in the grip of Muslim terror

Posted on March 26, 2012 by creeping

via Sheik Yer Mami

Neukölln, Berlin: Muslims want revenge on German who killed Muslim in self-defence — ‘This is a separate universe with its own laws’

I recently reported about the 18-year-old Yusef Al-Abed, who was stabbed to death as he and twenty of his armed Turkish and Arab friends attacked a collapsed German man: “Berlin: ‘tense armed calm’ after German killed Muslim in self-defence“. The German, known as Sven N., is to be acquitted, since he clearly acted in self-defence against the twenty Muslims, who were armed with knives and daggers. While Sven N. is recovering from having his skull fractured during the attack, tensions rise in the neighbourhood of Neukölln, Berlin, as ‘anti-German insults’ and talk about ‘burning down the neighbourhood’ and ‘riots’ is spreading in the Muslim dominated area.

Even though the German journalists only report bits and pieces of the story and one has to piece several articles together to get the full picture, they allow small and very interesting bits of information slip through — often buried deep inside the articles. The above-mentioned article ended with this quote: “‘Arab family clans appear regularly in hospitals and schools in order to make ruckus over trifles.’ Mostly in groups, usually armed.’”

Another article, “‘How did it come to this?‘” ends like this, clearly showing the role of their prophet and their women: “‘I do not know what will we do when we get hold of the offender.’ At this moment the sound words of the preacher Ferid Heider are a fitting response: ‘Think about it! How did it come to this?’ he calls out with a sad voice: ‘Dear brothers and sisters in Islam, we do not want our youth to fight, we are too small in this area for that. We want a youth who acts according to our prophet’s advice. We have to show what kind of religion Islam is.’ In the end, the women are also allowed to put flowers at the grave.”

In the article below, a Muslim tells us that ‘This is a separate universe with its own laws’.

Translated from German by Nicolai Sennels, Der Tagesspiegel March 8: “Knife attack in Neukölln: Police foresee revenge“:

After the fatal knife attack on an 18-year-old adolescent in Neukölln, there is talk of retaliation. Police officers visit families in the neighborhood and meeting places to talk about the release of the alleged offender.It is an explosive mixture. Grief and anger determine the atmosphere in the neighborhood around the so-called “White Settlement” (Muslim ghetto) in Neukölln. In the new neighborhood, young people are using the word ‘revenge’ when talking about the fatal knife attack on 18-year-old Yusef El-A. ‘I can guarantee one hundred percent that this will have a sequel. This is a separate universe with its own laws,’ says Burak K. as he describes the tense situation. Burak K. has lived in the neighbourhood his whole life and he knew Yusef by sight.

In reality, what Western country isn’t under attack by the spread of Islam? Name one.

WILL AMERICAN CHRISTIANS USE SOUND JUDGMENT WHEN THEY VOTE?

 By Dr. Carl Parnell, Ed.,D

March 6, 2012
NewsWithViews.com

The 2012 General Election will be the most important election in the history of the United States. If the American electorate permits President Barack Hussein Obama to dupe them to reelect him to a second term of office, America will undoubtedly become a nation that completely depends on the federal government for its very existence. But, what can be done to insure that President Obama doesn’t win a second term? Basically, it would take a concentrated front from America’s Christian community to vote as they are led collectively by the Holy Spirit, instead of voting for politicians who promise economic benefits if they are elected.

Unfortunately, though, Christians in America are divided just as much as the Republicans and the Democrats. Some Christians are conservative and promote the absolute truths of the Bible. On the other hand, some Christians are liberal and promote ideas that are contrary to the Bible. For example, most Republicans are against abortion and homosexuality. Whereas, most Democrats favor abortion and homosexuality. Of course, it is extremely difficult to understand how Christians could have two different viewpoints on these two issues and both viewpoints be correct. Ultimately, since God says what He means and means what He said, one group of Christians must change their belief system and, if America is to survive as a godly and free nation, they must use sound judgment (discernment) when they vote in the 2012 General Election. But, what is sound judgment? According to the Free Dictionary, Sound judgment is “the capacity to assess situations or circumstances shrewdly and to draw sound conclusions.” However, if they use bad judgment again, America will become a nation that would be unrecognizable and unacceptable by the Founding Fathers.

Therefore, what can be done to insure that Christians use sound judgment when they vote this year and every year in the future? First, Christians must realize that the absolute truths in the Bible never change Therefore, there cannot be two sides to Biblical issues. As a result, Christians who promote cultural issues that the Bible condemns and vote for men and women who advocate the same issues should realize that they are guilty of rebellion against God and His Holy Word. They should ask the Holy Spirit to lead them back to God and to show them the absolute truths that are contained in His Holy Word. Then, they should take God’s Word at face value and vote as the Holy Spirit leads them. Otherwise, these Christians would not be showing sound judgment.

Second, Christians must realize that the sanctity of life is very important to God the Creator. In fact, it is so important that God emphasized it in the Sixth Commandment, “Thou shalt not murder.” Ultimately, Christians who deny the sanctity of life to an unborn babies by way of abortion are committing first degree murder, which is a direct violation of God’s supreme laws. Therefore, Christians who supported political candidates that promoted abortion in the 2008 General Election did not use sound judgment. As a result, it was Christians who helped catapult Barack Obama into the White House in 2008, even though he supported abortion then and still supports this abomination to God now. But, more importantly now, will Christians use sound judgment when they vote in the 2012 General Election or will they once again elect a man to be President of the United States who openly defies God on a daily basis?

Third, Christians must realize that homosexuality and same-sex marriage is an abomination to God, too, even though currently eight states recognize such a marriage agreement. However, no born again Christian should recognize such a marriage arrangement that God Himself would denounce emphatically. Just read Romans 1: 18-27. But, many Christians do support same-sex marriage and the homosexual lifestyle. As a result, they inevitably support political candidates, such as President Obama, who repeatedly support the homosexual agenda. In fact, it is his administration that has legislated and enacted the law that permits open homosexuality in the military. Of course, that in itself is a blithe on the moral fiber of the United States. Therefore, will Christians go against the dictates of the Lord God Jehovah and vote President Obama back into office in 2012 or will they continue to assist satan in his ongoing efforts to destroy the United States and to eliminate Christianity and those professed Christians who actually read and obey His Holy Word?

Fourth, Christians must realize that candidates who are attempting to transform America into a socialistic nation do not have their best interest at heart. But, in 2008, many Christians swallowed the hook, line, and sinker when then Senator Obama promised a change for the better in the United States. In fact, his slogan was “We Believe in Change.” Well, Christians and non-Christians alike got a change, a change from capitalism to socialism. Socialism is an economic/governmental system that uses high taxation, government regulation, and strict legislation to control the general populace, while making American citizens think that they are in control of their lives.

Also, while the government under socialism controls its populace indirectly, there are several tenets of socialism that are incorporated by the government. According to Answers.Com, the tenets of socialism are:

• The abolition of private property and inheritance rights
• The redistribution of wealth through heavy, progressive income taxes
• A central state bank to control all credit
• Government control of all means of communication and transportation
• Government ownership of all means of production (factories, farms, mines)
• The abolition of unemployment through social welfare programs
• The redistribution of the population
• Mandatory state-sponsored and state-supported free education

Of course, it is unimaginable that Christians would vote for a person who is attempting to drive these socialistic tenets down the throat of American citizens, Christians and non-Christians alike. If the current administration has four more years, America will look like a woman who has had plastic surgery from a doctor who brutally mutilated her. As a result, if Christians vote for a reshowing of the current XXX-rated movie playing at the White House, America as a nation that permits freedom of religion and that operates under a free economic system known as capitalism will be no more. In fact, Christians might just find themselves mistreated and persecuted more than they would ever expect. Therefore, Christians must use sound, godly-inspired judgment (discernment) when they vote in the 2012 General Election. In fact, they should not vote for someone who purports a godless system of government, even more so than America already has.

For, as former President Ronald Reagan said, “We’ve been creeping closer to socialism, a system that someone once said works only in heaven, where it isn’t needed, and in hell, where they’ve already got it.” Also, in relation to socialism, Barry Goldwater, former five-term United States Senator from Arizona and the Republican Party’s nominee for President in the 1964 General Election, said, “A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take everything you have.”

Click here for part —–> 1,Fifth, Christians must realize that a welfare state, that the current administration is attempting to create in America, would not be God’s way of taking care of His creation, especially those who profess His Holy Name. God’s plan for taking care of His creation is written in Matthew 6:33. It reads, “But seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteous, and all these things shall be added unto you.” However, President Obama believes that wealth should be redistributed in the United States, which, as stated earlier, is a socialistic tenet. In fact, if you do not believe that wealth should be redistributed to help the poor, you are viewed as an insensitive, uncaring, greedy, and ungodly person.

© 2012 Dr. Carl Parnell – All Rights Reserved

Carl Parnell retired from public school teaching in 1999. He taught history and other social science courses for over forty years. He taught middle school, high school, and college level. Carl was a Lead Teacher and Principal of the On-Campus School at Georgia Baptist Children’s Home in central Georgia. Presently, he’s teaching at a private, Christian high school.

Carl served in the United States Army from 1968-1971. He also served in the United States Air Force Reserves from 1983-1986, was chosen Teacher of the Year in 1991. Carl was included in the 1993, 1994 and 2007 editions of Who’s Who Among America’s Teachers. He was selected Star Teacher at hes present school in 2007 and published his first book, “From Schoolhouse to Courthouse: Exposing America’s New Terror from Within” (ISBN: 1-58736-613-4) in July 2006.

Carl has completed his second book, which is in an eBook format, entitled “A Brewing Pot of Christian Persecution: America’s Postmodern Anti-Christian Crusade.” My eBook, as well as over 60 of my articles, can be viewed at FaithWriters. Com

Website: drcarlsterlingparnell.wiki.zoho.com

E-Mail: drcarlparnell@faithwriters.net

---

OBAMA’S LEGALIZATION OF SLAVERY AND SYSTEMATIC POPULATION REDUCTION PART 2

By Dave Hodges

March 19, 2012
NewsWithViews.com

“Necessity is the excuse for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of the tyrant and the creed of the slave.” -William Pitt

Since writing “Obama’s Legalization of Slavery and Systematic Population Reduction,” on March 18, 2012, I have been deluged with emails and a smattering of requests to do radio interviews. Most of the email content was very consistent in that I witnessed a collective heartfelt expression of profound shock, dismay and even fear as most of the individuals who emailed me, were coming to the realization that America’s descent into absolute tyranny is nearly complete. Yet, I must admit that a couple of the emails I received accused me of overreacting with regard to my conclusions about the Obama Executive Order (EO) and that his EO was merely “an updating” of a very similar EO enacted by Bill Clinton.

Among the requests I received for radio interviews, came in the form of a voicemail I received from the Denver based “Peter Boyles Show” (KHOW 630AM, a Clear Channel station). Remember, it was Clear Channel which drove prominent Phoenix talk show host Charles Goyette (KFYI) from the airwaves and banned the playing of any music from the Dixie Chicks on any of their affiliates because both Goyette and the renowned country music group dared to question the existence of weapons of mass destruction as the reason behind the pre-emptive military invasion of Iraq in the second Gulf War.

Subsequently, I was stunned that KHOW, a Clear Channel affiliate, would want to have me on the air to discuss such a constitutionally back-breaking EO in light of their previous history of practicing extreme censorship in response to any criticism with regard to the executive branch’s sense of entitlement when it comes to global imperialism on behalf of the Wall Street Financial Complex. However, my bewilderment soon faded when I visited KHOW’s website and read an article entitled “National Defense Resources Preparedness” Executive Order: Power Grab Or Mere Update. After reading the phrase “or mere update,” it dawned upon me that the intent of the interview was most likely designed to discredit my conclusions by accusing me of overreacting to Obama’s newest EO. Unfortunately, I did not reach Boyles’ producer, Greg Hollenback, until after the show had ended and subsequently I did not make an appearance. I would have relished the opportunity to go toe-to-toe with a member of the Clear Channel establishment media in order to wake up a few more Americans as to the tyranny we now face.

I freely admit that I did briefly pause and wonder if I indeed was overreacting Obama’s March 16th, 2012 EO. After some brief self-examination, the clear answer was an absolute and emphatic no! Although Obama’s EO is almost an identical update to Clinton’s EO 12919 (1994), we would be wise to take note that in Section 201(b) of the Obama version, Obama inserted the phrase “under both emergency and non-emergency conditions.” This enables the President, solely based upon his own authority, to declare peacetime martial law which is tantamount to the establishment of an indefinite dictatorship. Also, the intent behind the Obama EO must be considered within the context of the times that we presently live in. To that point, Eric Holder, on behalf of President Obama, is asserting the power to assassinate Americans, anytime, anywhere, for any reason or for no reason, whatsoever. Further, President Obama is asserting the power to kidnap and indefinitely imprison Americans without a trial under the NDAA. Finally, the Department of the Defense, operating under the ultimate authority of President Obama, is asserting the power to label legitimate protesting as an act of terrorism.

When one thoughtfully considers the totality of Obama’s recent and reckless actions, there can be no doubt that America is witnessing the systematic and incremental implementation of Obama’s modern day version of the Nazi Enabling Act.

The Enabling Act permitted the German cabinet to enact previously prohibited legislation, which included laws which clearly deviated from and profoundly altered the meaning of the German constitution. As with Obama’s unconstitutional actions, this was accomplished without the consent of the Reichstag. Within the parameters of the Enabling Act, the Nazis created “Special Courts” to punish political dissent in a strikingly similar manner identified in the Obama sponsored NDAA as well as a number of declarations and proclamations referenced in the previous paragraph. Also contained in the Enabling Act was a series of civil laws that barred Jews from holding civil service positions as well as jobs in the legal, medical and teaching professions.

As we collectively ponder Obama’s next move, and given Obama’s decidedly anti-Christian attitude, I have to wonder if we will not be soon substituting the word “Christian” in place of the word “Jew” in the next round of his emerging version of the Enabling Act.

When the Nazis came for the communists,In a poem attributed to Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) regarding apparent inactivity of German citizens following the Nazi rise to power and their subsequent persecution of their chosen target groups.

I remained silent;
I was not a communist.

When they locked up the social democrats,
I remained silent;
I was not a social democrat.

When they came for the trade unionists,
I did not speak out;
I was not a trade unionist.

When they came for me,
There was no one left to speak out.

If you strain your ears you might be able to hear the sound of boots marching, in unison, as they head in your direction. If clear your nostrils and inhale deeply, you may get a whiff from the odor of burning books. And if you take the time to look upon the annals of history, you may recall that Heinrich Heine prophetically stated, nearly two centuries ago, “Where they burn books, they will ultimately burn people.” For part one click below.

Click here for part —–> 1,

© 2012 Dave Hodges – All Rights Reserved

---

Dave Hodges is an award winning psychology, sociology, statistics and research professor, a college basketball coach as well as a former mental health counselor. Dave also serves as the spokesperson to the newly formed national coalition, The American Coalition to Protect Personal Property Rights, which is designed to combat the growing erosion of personal property rights across America.

Often referred to America’s most independent talk show host, Dave Hodges is the host of the nationally syndicated, hard-hitting and exciting investigative radio talk show called “The Common Sense Show.” “The Common Sense Show” airs on the Republic Broadcasting Network every Sunday evening from 9-11pm Central. The show features an array of impressive guests coupled with an in-depth analysis of important personal, social and geopolitical issues which are largely unreported in the mainstream media. The wide variety of show topics ranges from the loss of constitutional liberties, to the subsequent implementation of a police state under world governance, to exploring the limits of human potential. The primary purpose of “The Common Sense Show” is to provide the listening audience with the tools necessary to reclaim both their individual freedoms and national sovereignty.

Learn more about his radio talk show:

Dave Hodges DCH, MC, NCC
The Common Sense Show airing on The Republic Broadcasting Network
Sunday’s 9PM-Midnight Central

Every person will have a CHIP inserted on their body by march 2013

 THis can be found on page 1013 starting on the bottom of page 1013  Of H.R. 4872 of Obamacare.

        Subtitle C—National Medical Device Registry

SEC. 2521. NATIONAL MEDICAL DEVICE REGISTRY.

(a) REGISTRY.—

VerDate Nov 24 2008

•HR 4872 RH 23:53 Mar 17, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 01013 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4872.RH H4872

dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

1014 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 519 of the Federal

Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 360i) is amended—

(A) by redesignating subsection (g) as sub- section (h); and

(B) by inserting after subsection (f) the following:

‘‘National Medical Device Registry ‘‘(g)(1) The Secretary shall establish a national med- ical device registry (in this subsection referred to as the ‘registry’) to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and

outcomes data on each device that— ‘‘(A) is or has been used in or on a patient; and ‘‘(B) is—

‘‘(i) a class III device; or

‘‘(ii) a class II device that is implantable, life-supporting, or life-sustaining.

‘‘(2) In developing the registry, the Secretary shall, in consultation with the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the head of the Office of the National Coordi- nator for Health Information Technology, and the Sec- retary of Veterans Affairs, determine the best methods for—

VerDate Nov 24 2008

•HR 4872 RH 23:53 Mar 17, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 01014 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4872.RH H4872

dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS

VerDate Nov 24 2008

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

23:53 Mar 17, 2010

1015 ‘‘(A) including in the registry, in a manner con-

sistent with subsection (f), appropriate information to identify each device described in paragraph (1) by type, model, and serial number or other unique iden- tifier;

‘‘(B) validating methods for analyzing patient safety and outcomes data from multiple sources and for linking such data with the information included in the registry as described in subparagraph (A), in- cluding, to the extent feasible, use of—

‘‘(i) data provided to the Secretary under other provisions of this chapter; and

‘‘(ii) information from public and private sources identified under paragraph (3); ‘‘(C) integrating the activities described in this

subsection with— ‘‘(i) activities under paragraph (3) of sec-

tion 505(k) (relating to active postmarket risk identification);

‘‘(ii) activities under paragraph (4) of sec- tion 505(k) (relating to advanced analysis of drug safety data); and

‘‘(iii) other postmarket device surveillance activities of the Secretary authorized by this chapter; and

•HR 4872 RH Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 01015 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4872.RH H4872

dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

1016 ‘‘(D) providing public access to the data and

analysis collected or developed through the registry in a manner and form that protects patient privacy and proprietary information and is comprehensive, useful, and not misleading to patients, physicians, and scientists.

‘‘(3)(A) To facilitate analyses of postmarket safety and patient outcomes for devices described in paragraph (1), the Secretary shall, in collaboration with public, aca- demic, and private entities, develop methods to—

‘‘(i) obtain access to disparate sources of patient safety and outcomes data, including—

VerDate Nov 24 2008

23:53 Mar 17, 2010

•HR 4872 RH Jkt 089200 PO 00000

‘‘(I) Federal health-related electronic data (such as data from the Medicare pro- gram under title XVIII of the Social Secu- rity Act or from the health systems of the Department of Veterans Affairs);

‘‘(II) private sector health-related electronic data (such as pharmaceutical purchase data and health insurance claims data); and

‘‘(III) other data as the Secretary deems necessary to permit postmarket as- sessment of device safety and effectiveness; and

Frm 01016 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4872.RH H4872

dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS

1017 1 ‘‘(ii) link data obtained under clause (i)

2 with information in the registry. 3 ‘‘(B) In this paragraph, the term ‘data’ refers to in- 4 formation respecting a device described in paragraph (1), 5 including claims data, patient survey data, standardized 6 analytic files that allow for the pooling and analysis of 7 data from disparate data environments, electronic health 8 records, and any other data deemed appropriate by the 9 Secretary.

10 ‘‘(4) Not later than 36 months after the date of the 11 enactment of this subsection, the Secretary shall promul- 12 gate regulations for establishment and operation of the 13 registry under paragraph (1). Such regulations—

VerDate Nov 24 2008

14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

23:53 Mar 17, 2010

‘‘(A)(i) in the case of devices that are described in paragraph (1) and sold on or after the date of the enactment of this subsection, shall require manufac- turers of such devices to submit information to the registry, including, for each such device, the type, model, and serial number or, if required under sub- section (f), other unique device identifier; and

‘‘(ii) in the case of devices that are described in paragraph (1) and sold before such date, may re- quire manufacturers of such devices to submit such information to the registry, if deemed necessary by the Secretary to protect the public health;

•HR 4872 RH Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 01017 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4872.RH H4872

dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS

VerDate Nov 24 2008

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

23:53 Mar 17, 2010

1018 ‘‘(B) shall establish procedures—

‘‘(i) to permit linkage of information sub- mitted pursuant to subparagraph (A) with pa- tient safety and outcomes data obtained under paragraph (3); and

‘‘(ii) to permit analyses of linked data; ‘‘(C) may require device manufacturers to sub- mit such other information as is necessary to facili- tate postmarket assessments of device safety and ef-

fectiveness and notification of device risks; ‘‘(D) shall establish requirements for regular and timely reports to the Secretary, which shall be included in the registry, concerning adverse event trends, adverse event patterns, incidence and preva- lence of adverse events, and other information the Secretary determines appropriate, which may include data on comparative safety and outcomes trends;

and

‘‘(E) shall establish procedures to permit public access to the information in the registry in a manner and form that protects patient privacy and propri- etary information and is comprehensive, useful, and not misleading to patients, physicians, and sci- entists.

•HR 4872 RH Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 01018 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4872.RH H4872

dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

1019 ‘‘(5) To carry out this subsection, there are author-

ized to be appropriated such sums as may be necessary for fiscal years 2010 and 2011.’’.

(2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall establish and begin implementation of the registry under section 519(g) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as added by paragraph (1), by not later than the date that is 36 months after the date of the en- actment of this Act, without regard to whether or not final regulations to establish and operate the registry have been promulgated by such date.

(3) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 303(f)(1)(B)(ii) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 333(f)(1)(B)(ii)) is amend- ed by striking ‘‘519(g)’’ and inserting ‘‘519(h)’’.

(b) ELECTRONIC EXCHANGE AND USE IN CERTIFIED ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS OF UNIQUE DEVICE IDENTIFIERS.—

(1) RECOMMENDATIONS.—The HIT Policy Committee established under section 3002 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300jj–12) shall recommend to the head of the Office of the Na- tional Coordinator for Health Information Tech- nology standards, implementation specifications, and

•HR 4872 RH Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 01019 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4872.RH H4872

VerDate Nov 24 2008

23:53 Mar 17, 2010

dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS

VerDate Nov 24 2008

1020 1 certification criteria for the electronic exchange and

2 use in certified electronic health records of a unique 3 device identifier for each device described in section 4 519(g)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic 5 Act, as added by subsection (a).

6 (2) STANDARDS, IMPLEMENTATION CRITERIA, 7 AND CERTIFICATION CRITERIA.—The Secretary of 8 the Health Human Services, acting through the 9 head of the Office of the National Coordinator for

10 Health Information Technology, shall adopt stand- 11 ards, implementation specifications, and certification 12 criteria for the electronic exchange and use in cer- 13 tified electronic health records of a unique device 14 identifier for each device described in paragraph (1), 15 if such an identifier is required by section 519(f) of 16 the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 17 U.S.C. 360i(f)) for the device.

18 Subtitle D—Grants for Comprehen- 19 sive Programs To Provide Edu- 20 cation to Nurses and Create a 21 Pipeline to Nursing

22 SEC. 2531. ESTABLISHMENT OF GRANT PROGRAM. 23 (a) PURPOSES.—It is the purpose of this section to 24 authorize grants to—

•HR 4872 RH 23:53 Mar 17, 2010 Jkt 089200 PO 00000 Frm 01020 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H4872.RH H4872

dcolon on DSK2BSOYB1PROD with BILLS

VerDate Nov 24 2008

 

OBAMA’S SECRET WAR-MAKING FOR THE U.N

 By Cliff Kincaid

March 24, 2012
NewsWithViews.com

You may not have heard of PSD-10 because it has received no significant coverage from the major media. Yet, President Obama issued “Presidential Study Directive 10” last August 4, 2011, and posted it on the White House website. It amounts to a new and potentially far-reaching exercise of American military power cloaked in humanitarian language and conducted under the auspices of the United Nations and the International Criminal Court.

Under this new “Obama doctrine,” U.S. troops can be deployed to arrest or even terminate individuals wanted by the International Criminal Court, which is based on a treaty that has not been ratified by the U.S. Senate and isn’t even up for Senate consideration.

This “Presidential Study Directive on Mass Atrocities,” another name for PSD-10, declares that “Preventing mass atrocities and genocide is a core national security interest and a core moral responsibility of the United States.” This is at sharp variance with the traditional role of the U.S. military—self-defense and protection of the homeland. Toward this end, an “Interagency Atrocities Prevention Board” is being formed to develop and implement this new Obama doctrine. However, it is apparent that the doctrine is already going forward.

Members of the public haven’t heard of PSD-10, but they may have heard of a decision Obama made on October 14, 2011, when he informed Congress that he had authorized “a small number of combat equipped U.S. forces to deploy to central Africa to provide assistance to regional forces that are working toward the removal of Joseph Kony from the battlefield.”

Kony, a Ugandan warlord who runs the Lord’s Resistance Army (LRA), is better known than most foreigners, since he is the subject of the viral “Kony 2012” video about the more than 30,000 “invisible children” he has allegedly murdered or abducted. His whereabouts are unknown, although it is believed he is no longer in Uganda.

Despite the name of his group, Kony is not a Christian and instead receives backing from the Islamic regime in northern Sudan. Although he poses no direct threat to the United States and has not carried out terrorist attacks on the U.S. or killed any American citizens, the Department of Treasury has designated him as a “global terrorist” under Executive Order 13224, a measure signed into law by President Bush after the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

In regard to seeking Kony’s “removal,” Obama told Congress, “I have directed this deployment, which is in the national security and foreign policy interests of the United States, pursuant to my constitutional authority to conduct U.S. foreign relations and as Commander in Chief and Chief Executive.”

Obama noted that Congress, in passing the “Lord’s Resistance Army Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act of 2009,” had “expressed support for increased, comprehensive U.S. efforts to help mitigate and eliminate the threat posed by the LRA to civilians and regional stability.” But it did not authorize deployment of combat forces. What’s more, a statement from Obama after signing the law did not give any indication any would be sent.

One of the sponsors of the bill, Rep. Edward Royce (R-CA), has subsequently introduced “Rewards for Justice” legislation (H.R. 4077) that would allow the State Department to offer a reward for the apprehension of Kony.

For his part, Obama is basically deploying the U.S. Armed Forces on behalf of the International Criminal Court (ICC), which indicted Kony for war crimes in 2005 and issued an arrest warrant for him. However, not only has the U.S. Senate not ratified the ICC treaty, Congress has never authorized the use of U.S. troops to carry out the ICC’s edicts. So where does Obama get the power to deploy U.S. troops in this manner?

The question is made more relevant because Obama has such an expansive view of his own executive power to wage war. He claims the power to kill American citizens overseas, on the grounds that they collaborate with foreign terrorist groups, and FBI Director Robert Mueller has told Congressthat he is not sure whether the president also has the power to kill American citizens on American soil, inside the United States. Mueller testified, “I have to go back. Uh, I’m not certain whether that was addressed or not.”

In the case of Kony, Obama seems to be taking his cue from the ICC. Its prosecutor, Luis Moreno Ocampo, appears in the “Kony 2012” video, noting that Kony was the first person ever indicted by the court. The video also celebrates Obama’s decision to use U.S. troops to try to apprehend Kony. It does not take a big exercise in connecting the dots to arrive at the conclusion that Obama is using U.S. troops to carry out the orders of the ICC. But rather than seek ratification of the ICC and then obtain the approval of Congress to apprehend Kony, and perhaps even to kill him, Obama simply issues orders to U.S. troops and bypasses the Congress.

Last October Jake Tapper of ABC News asked Obama about the decision to deploy troops “to help eliminate Joseph Kony and the Lord’s Resistance Army.” Obama replied:

“Well none of these decisions are easy, but those who are familiar with the Lord’s Resistance Army and their leader, Mr. Kony, know that these are some of the most vicious killers. They terrorize villages, they take children into custody and turn them into child soldiers, they engage in rape and slaughter in villages they go through. They have been a scourge on Uganda and that entire region, eastern Africa. So there has been strong bi-partisan support and a coalition, everything from evangelical Christians to folks on the left and human rights organizations who have said it is an international obligation for us to try to take them on. And so given that bipartisan support across the board belief that we have to do something about this, what we’ve done is we’ve provided these advisors. They are not going to be in a situation where they are called upon to hunt down the Lord’s Resistance Army or actively fire on them, but they will be in a position to protect themselves. What they can do is provide the logistical support that is needed, the advice, the training and the logistical support that hopefully will allow this kind of stuff to stop.”

Notice the use of the term “international obligation.” That is not the same as a declaration of war or resolution on the use of force from Congress.

Indeed, the Obama Administration seems to have the view that it has to seek authorization for military action against foreign regimes or individuals from the U.N. or NATO, but not from Congress. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta recently told a Senate committee that the U.S. military would have to seek “international permission” before intervening in Syria. Senator Jeff Sessionsresponded, “I’m really baffled by the idea that somehow an international assembly provides a legal basis for the United States military to be deployed in combat. I don’t believe it’s close to being correct. They provide no legal authority. The only legal authority that’s required to deploy the United States military is of the Congress and the president and the law and the Constitution.”

On top of this announcement, we now learn, also from Tapper, that “according to a senior administration official, President Obama first heard about the [Kony 2012] video the same way so many people have: from one of his children. In this case, it was from Malia, 13.”

Some liberals are now complaining that the “Kony 2012” video has become a “pretext for military intervention.” If so, it is after the fact. They fear the intervention may not really be designed to find Kony. Still, it is not too late for liberals and conservatives alike to question whether Obama has superseded his constitutional and legal authority. It is certainly time for the major media to examine what Obama is getting the United States into in Africa—and on what legal basis, if any, he is doing it.

While Obama had ordered U.S. troops to apprehend Kony, he has been careful not to order them to arrest and detain Sudanese President Omar Al-Bashir, a patron of Kony’s who has also been indicted by the ICC on charges of genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes. The Sudan is a member in good standing of the Organization of the Islamic Conference. The crimes of Al-Bashir dwarf those of Kony.

It should be apparent what is happening here. The Obama Administration has what the United Nations Association calls an “evolving policy” of “positive engagement” toward the ICC. It doesn’t seem to matter that the administration isn’t seeking ratification of the ICC, also known as the Rome Statute, and has no plans to do so.

The policy is an open secret. Rosemary A. DiCarlo, the U.S. Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations, has said, “Although the United States is not a party to the Rome Statute, over the past several years we have sent observer delegations to the Assembly of States Parties (ASP) sessions and the Review Conference in Kampala. In December, we cosponsored a high-level panel at the ASP to highlight the importance of ensuring protection for witnesses and judicial officers. We have engaged with the Office of the Prosecutor and the Registrar to consider ways to support specific prosecutions already underway, and we have responded positively to a number of informal requests for assistance.”

So while the Pentagon prepares for across-the-board cuts in national security and defense programs, plans are underway by the Obama Administration to use some of what’s left of our military to operate on behalf of the United Nations and the ICC. The “fundamental transformation” of the United States is now underway at the Department of Defense.She spoke of the need for “transnational justice,” saying that the review undertaken as part of implementing Presidential Study Directive-10 would focus on “how we can work with our international partners to more effectively prevent and respond to atrocities. We look forward to working with our partners to strengthen the international community’s capabilities in this area.”

© 2012 Cliff Kincaid – All Rights Reserved

Cliff Kincaid, a veteran journalist and media critic, Cliff concentrated in journalism and communications at the University of Toledo, where he graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree.

Cliff has written or co-authored nine books on media and cultural affairs and foreign policy issues. One of Cliff’s books, “Global Bondage: The UN Plan to Rule the World” is still awailable.

Cliff has appeared on Hannity & Colmes, The O’Reilly Factor, Crossfire and has been published in the Washington Post, Washington Times, Chronicles, Human Events and Insight.

Web Site: www.AIM.org

E-Mail: cliff.kincaid@aim.org